• Menu
  • Skip to left header navigation
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Books & Such Literary Management

A full-service literary agency that focuses on books for the Christian market.

  • Home
  • About Us
    • About Books & Such
    • Our Agents
    • Our Behind-the-Scenes Staff
    • Our Travel Schedule
  • Our Authors
    • Author News
    • Collaborators and Ghostwriters
  • Submissions
  • Resources
    • Recommended Reading
    • Virtual Writing Intensive
    • Podcast
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Editors Select
  • Home
  • About Us
    • About Books & Such
    • Our Agents
    • Our Behind-the-Scenes Staff
    • Our Travel Schedule
  • Our Authors
    • Author News
    • Collaborators and Ghostwriters
  • Submissions
  • Resources
    • Recommended Reading
    • Virtual Writing Intensive
    • Podcast
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Editors Select

Tradition!

March 5, 2009 //  by Janet Grant//  4 Comments

Blogger: Janet Kobobel Grant

Location: Books & Such Main Office, Santa Rosa, Calif.

Like Tevye’s song, “Tradition,” in Fiddler on the Roof suggests, sometimes it makes sense for the author to hum a few bars on the merits of tradition. A traditional, royalty-paying publisher offers a neat package to the writer that enables him or her to concentrate on creating a great manuscript.

Hey, I get that traditional publishing can seem like a fortress that’s impossible to penetrate. Egads, many publishers won’t even accept a query from an unagented writer let alone offer to publish your work!

But publishers who make an investment of tens of thousands of dollars in your book bring a lot to the table. It’s sort of like staying at a five-star hotel as opposed to Motel 6. Self-publishing is no-frills; royalty-paying publishers have plenty of razzle-dazzle, at-your-service options to offer, including: an editor who holds your feet to the fire and makes you create your very best work; a marketing staff who have ideas to promote your work that would never have occurred to you; publicity people with connections in all the right places (you mean Oprah? yup); sales staff with working relationships with book buyers at all the major outlets and who are paid to make regular calls on those buyers.

Okay, okay, so I’m strutting the idealized version of a royalty-paying publisher. No, your book isn’t necessarily going to be pitched to Oprah. No, your book won’t necessarily get the Top of the Mark marketing budget. But my point is, royalty-paying publishers have the wherewithal to provide all this and more. These publishers warehouse copies of your book; keep track of its inventory; send it out and send you money based on those sales; offer it to foreign language publishers; release your book in a vareity of formats such as hardback, then trade paper, then mass market; produce a gift book or a workbook out of your material, etc.

These are the folks who have been creating books for a very long time. And, here’s the really good news: They want to pay you to let them produce your book.

To give a fully rounded picture, I have to say that neither method of publishing is without its flaws. But I hope that I’ve clarified in these posts that traditional publishing and self-publishing really are like cats and dogs–two very different critters, both inherently offering us reasons to like them and reasons to wonder why a person would ever put up with them.

What are your thoughts on the matter?

  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Email

Category: Authors, Authors, Publishers, Writing LifeTag: royalty-paying publishers

Previous Post: « MARKETING MATTERS: The Writer’s Resume
Next Post: Publishing Perceptions »

Reader Interactions

Comments

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. Lynn Rush

    March 5, 2009 at 8:52 am

    I once went to a conference hosted by mostly self published authors. They hyped it up (of course). I did some research, mostly on blogs like this, and I’ve really come to the conclusion that traditional is the way to go.

    You can’t beat the resources, really. Editing, marketing…just like you mentioned here today.

    I’ve read a couple self – pubbed books, and it was evident that the editing was not professionally done.

    I, personally, think traditional publishing houses are the way to produce quality books! Sure, it’s hard to break through and get published, but it shouldn’t be easy…otherwise less than excellent books get published.

    Great post today!

    Reply
  2. Val C.

    March 5, 2009 at 11:24 am

    It feels like cats and dogs some days too 😉

    Thanks for laying out the differences so clearly. I think a person really has to understand their personal strengths and resources before deciding which route might work best for them.

    I do have a question – in the past, writers have been told there was a sort of stigma attached to self publishing when approaching a traditional publisher. Would you say that still the perception?

    Reply
  3. Janet Grant

    March 5, 2009 at 12:23 pm

    I think most agents and editors understand that self-publishing has changed a lot in the last few years, making it much easier to do, especially with print on demand. But, if an author has a string of self-published novels that each sold a few hundred copies, that would reflect negatively on the writer. On the other hand, if someone self-published and sold, say, 5,000 copies, that starts to look like a project traditional publishing would want to seriously consider because the author has proved a ready audience is out there.

    Reply
  4. Michael N. Marcus

    March 5, 2009 at 10:23 pm

    I’ve had books published by Doubleday and other “traditional” publishers and was never happy with the product, the deal or the income.

    Last year I established my own publishing company.

    I’ve just completed my third self-pubbed book, and am writing #4 and #5.

    The earnings-per-copy, speed to get a book on the market, speed to receive money, creative control, plus overall satisfaction and fun are infinitely better.

    I can’t imagine ever going bact to doing a book “the old way.

    Michael N. Marcus

    http://www.SilverSandsBooks.com
    http://BookMakingBlog.blogspot.com

    Reply

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe to the Blog

Awards

Feedspot Top Literary Agent Blog Top 50 Writing Blogs









Site Footer

Connect with Us

  • Books & Such
  • Janet Grant
  • Cynthia Ruchti
  • Rachel Kent
  • Wendy Lawton
  • Barb Roose
  • Debbie Alsdorf
  • Jen Babakhan
  • Janet Grant
  • Cynthia Ruchti
  • Rachel Kent
  • Barb Roose
  • Debbie Alsdorf
  • Cynthia Ruchti
  • Wendy Lawton
  • Barb Roose
  • Debbie Alsdorf
  • Jen Babakhan
  • Debbie Alsdorf

Copyright © 2025 Books & Such Literary Management • All Rights Reserved • Privacy Policy • Site by Erin Ulrich Creative

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok